Feb
21
2011
Ok, so not really...I kinda fouled myself
 wrote this at 9:28 pm

 

[rehashing pics from a year ago since the photography protocol hasn't re-engaged yet]

How to tell you this story without having to go into all the detailed back-story…that’s my question tonight.

Hmm….

Ok, so you know the thing I signed-up for back when & how I was really excited about it at the time?…Yeah, not so much anymore.

[too vague?]

Hmm….Ok. How ’bout this?

Soon I will be teaching a group of senior leadership spouses (think 4-star & down) on the merits of “bouncing & not breaking” along with 4 other trained spouses. The Army’s new catch-phrase for esiliency-ray (love pig latin – it confuses Google).

And as you can imagine, I’m a little nervous. For you see, like a complete & utter fool, I volunteered – no, I just about mandated that I should probably start the course off.

What was I thinking?!

Well, I was thinking that out of all the people who need to learn how to bounce & not break, I’m guessing they’re not even on the list. These women nailed that skill a good twenty years ago & standing up in front of them to preach the values of bouncing just seems ridiculous…and that whoever teaches first had better get it right, had better set the tone right & had better not offend them right out of the gate…that’s what I was thinking.

So enters the fool.

To top things off, I - like the horrible procrastinator that I am, only just tonight read the re-written material I’m supposed to teach. Re-written material specifically to address the issues & attitudes of Army spouses.

To be fair, it was re-written (although tweaked is a better word) by the other 4 spouses while I was back home. So no. I didn’t get in on those meetings – which apparently turned out to be a good thing as I heard things got a little, shall we say…”heated”.

That was mid-December. Fast forward to January & they were still beating the dead horse about which material to use. Fast forward again to February and well, politics came into play, suddnely there was a new sheriff in town & a service was finally held for that poor horse.

It was lovely; I brought flowers.

So here we are tonight. I’ve just read the “material” and oh, bugger. Some of this is total crap. (Ok, well…my opinion, crap.)

I totally get that I’ve missed my window of opportunity to throw in my two cents & since I was at that funeral I have no right to dig up that poor, dead, decomposing horse just so I can get a shot in.

And it’s buggin’ the tar out of me.

The original material was written for the Joe’s – the soldiers. The ones who needed it watered-down the most….ok, let’s be honest here- dumbed-down the most. But somehow that fact wasn’t caught by my counterparts and now I have to figure out how to say a scenario - with a straight face, in front of two general’s wives…

[ahem]

“I almost didn’t get dinner on the table because the sink was leaking.”

[dramatic pause]

Are you kidding me?

Are we really going to imply that these women…that ANY Army spouse…couldn’t figure out how to get dinner on the table just because of a damn, leaky faucet?

It just twists in my side.

Couldn’t they have figured out a different way to convey frustration over a soldier-spouse not doing something he said he was going to do?

Really?….

Just kill me now…and bury me next to that damn horse.

One lonely response
  1. hydrantgirl says:

    I’ve missed your writing – glad youre back :-) and good luck on this one. Maybe a slight sarcastic tone will get your point across?

So What Do You Think?

 




Go back to the Home Page

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.